DOH! Here's how I lay it down. This is part (mostly) science, and part (also mostly) experience. I've been at this awhile, and think I carry some street cred. If you don't believe the science part, get yourself 2 books: Physiology of Sport and Exercise by Jack H. Wilmore and David L. Costill, and Complete Guide to Sports Nutrition by Monique Ryan (although there are other good sports nutrition books out there, but I will stand by Monique all the way). Read them cover to cover and then check back with me if you think I'm full of it. If you don't know what glycogen is, Google it and read all about it.
When you are exercising, your body needs to burn carbohydrates. It can get those carbs from 3 places:
- Glycogen stored in your liver (about 400 calories worth)
- Glycogen stored in your muscles (1400-1800 calories worth)
- Circulating glucose (sugar) in your bloodstream (depends on how much is there)
Exercising at less than 60% of Max HR (WHO DOES THAT???) will burn almost 100% fat.
When you exercise at 60-80% of your Max HR, about 50% of the energy comes from muscle glycogen and blood glucose, about 50% from fat, and a small amount from protein (muscle breakdown). The percentages of carbs vs. fats depends on the intensity.
When you exercise at over 80% of your Max HR, about 75% of the energy comes from muscle glycogen and blood glucose (fat can't be utilized effectively at this intensity).
Stay with me here, I'm getting to the point.
As a person becomes more fit, their body is able to burn a little more fat during aerobic exercise. This is accomplished by spending the bulk of the training time at 60-80% of Max HR.
A couple of things should stick out to you, but in case they don't, let me point them out (they are subtle but true):
- If you spend too much time exercising at over 80% Max HR, you are teaching your body to burn glycogen preferentially for fuel. Your body just gets used to it. This is why I preach DO YOUR EASY STUFF EASY. There's a "dead zone" that is 80-85% of Max HR (depending on your fitness) that can be a waste of time to spend any of your training time in. Better to go easy or hard. And if you are going to go hard, GO HARDCORE AGGRO while you're at it!
- If you put sugar into your bloodstream WHILE YOU EXERCISE, your body can use it pretty effectively.
- If you don't put sugar into your bloodstream WHILE YOU EXERCISE, your body is going to exhaust its glycogen stores faster, which won't make you a better fat burner--it will just use up your glycogen faster, and if you exercise long enough, it will make you bonk faster!!!!
See if by not feeding yourself while you exercise you could make your body burn lots of fat, then why would someone eat during an Ironman? We all have TONS of potential fat calories (I, little Yard Gnome that I am, have over 43,000 potential fat calories) available. But like it or not, our bodies are going to go through that glycogen and whatever is in our blood before it starts tapping on those mega-fat stores. Our bodies need to preserve a few things: our brains, which live off of pure glucose (see this is why the first sign of impending bonk is that your judgment gets weird, or you get dizzy) and our internal organs. Our brains would rather shut down our muscles (i.e., make you stop moving) than risk injury to the internal organs. This is the extreme form of bonk.
Bonking occurs when your body cannot meet its carbohydrate needs during exercise from a combination of glycogen and blood glucose. But it's a little trickier than that. Let's say you exhaust your glycogen stores and then dump sugar into your bloodstream. It may be too late! You need to put so much in at a constant rate (generally to tolerance--my rule of thumb is to try and take in 50% of the calories I am burning, a little more while biking) so that your GI tract is able to process it and your metabolism keeps the "switch" turned on so that you keep using that circulating blood glucose for energy. You've all read or heard about athletes whose digestion shuts down, and that inevitably leads to a bonk or else they need to stop and wait it out until their GI tract recovers.
I ALWAYS take in sugars while exercising, even for as little as a 30-minute workout. Why? Because then I am always training my gut to process those sugars and send them to my working muscles. EVERY DAY. Now, of course that means that the stuff I take in during exercise counts towards my daily calorie needs, and of course it does, and maybe that means I get to eat less "food" than otherwise, but the tradeoff to me is clear. My body is trained to utilize fuel, and a side bonus is that I am not starving once I finish a workout (well, except when it's 2 or more hours, then pretty much I'm hungry).
How many people do you know who swear by "I just drink water when I train" and then watch them after a workout and they just undid all their hard work by pigging out? Not only that, but while they were busy exercising with no fuel, their brains figured, "Hey, we're being starved here," so the body went into fat preservation mode, NOT fat burning mode.
Even if a person is trying to lose weight or lean out, I would NOT recommend that they cut back on their training nutrition. Face it, if you are trying to be smaller, then you are going to need to get used to eating less across the board. Eventually, the calories you take in during training will need to drop as well, but initially the last thing you want to do is deprive your body of calories while training, which even MORE convinces it that you are starving it, and will slow your metabolism even further!
So if I were to state "Crackhead's Basic Nutrition Rules" they would be:
- Eat frequently. 6 or more times a day.
- Don't eat a lot of food, by volume, at any one sitting
- Always be sipping Gatorade or your favorite training beverage during workouts, even if they are short. Do some math. Make sure you achieve proper fluid volume (4-6 oz. every 15-20 min., or 16-24 oz. per hour, adjust up depending on your sweat rate and heat), and that you are replacing 50% or better of your calories
- Don't forget to include your training nutrition calories in your daily totals
- Don't be afraid to be a little hungry when you aren't training.
- You should NOT be hungry while you are training! If you are, pop a gel or something.
- So that you teach your body to burn fat effectively, complete your workouts at the proper intensity. Don't be tempted to turn an easy workout into a hard one--it will do a number on your glycogen stores
- Be sure to replenish after workouts. I use Endurox R4 on days when I train 1.5 hours or more, which is pretty much daily now. I drink it after my last workout of the day. You can also drink sports drink, but I think it's important to have some protein right away, too.
- If you are trying to lose weight or just lean out, go a little higher on your protein calories and slightly lower on your carbs (but NOT DURING TRAINING!).
- If you want to jump start leaning out, you probably should do some strength training. Lots of cardio has a way of making you want to eat to replace the calories you burned; whereas strength training helps you manufacture muscle and just burns more calories at rest.
Train (and NOURISH) on!
9 comments:
Nicely done, and damn quick too! Guess I can stop lecturing 'you know who'.
BTW, the authors you recommended were also recommended by the staff of USA Cycling... you know, the guys who train our olympic hopefuls.
:)
BTW, been meaning to ask you. Why does Shelley call you Crackhead? ;)
AMAZING post! Very informative. I have always wondered how many cals are stored in the liver and in muscle glycogen; now I know!
Crackhead was actually bestowed on me by another triathlete on an email list. It was meant as a compliment to the degree of difficulty of workouts that I posed on said list near the end of last summer in my buildup for IMWI.
So even though I talk about "hard" workouts now, you ain't seen nuthin' yet. They are coming though, tune in late March when I start my push to IM Brazil. I am scared (NOT!) just thinking about those workouts!
Beautiful job describing all that. Monique Ryan's book is my bible. You don't put your HR on your summary pages...I, personally, would love to see that!
For Lora, and anyone else interested in my HR data:
I don't track my HR while swimming, so I can't show any HR data there. I used to wear the HRM in the pool, but now that I am so lean, it doesn't stay in position when I'm swimming, so I get really goofy readings. I do wear the HRM in a race, though, and I'm either wearing close-fitting stuff or a wetsuit or both, and I get pretty good information there. I swim and measure my progress just by pace and feel. I am in no danger of pushing myself too hard swimming; I am such a slow-twitcher. I can go forever, but speed, fuhgeddaboutit!
For biking, I measure my workout quality and fitness by watts, although I do wear my HRM, so I see (and the SRM records) my HR data, which to me is just "interesting information." And since my speed sensor is on my front wheel, I have no idea how "fast" I am going while on the trainer, and I could care less. Speed is variable depending on conditions, so it would be foolish for me to use this as a measure of my fitness. However, all things being equal, the more watts you can push, the faster you will go. Once I get outdoors, I will be able to see how my efforts have paid off in the speed department!
For running, I do my workouts and monitor my progress by pace, and again, although I wear my HRM, the information it gives me is just "interesting." The only time I pay attention to it is when it gets hot out in the summer. For my first few acclimation runs, I use the HR as a "governor," keeping my HR in a certain range until I acclimate to the heat (which usually takes about 2 weeks). I also do look at my HR in a race, but again, if I'm pacing properly, whatever my HR is doesn't matter so much--I am trained well enough that I don't need to watch it so much.
For the record, though, my max. HR is 164 (no, I don't go by the charts or anything). I determined this by doing a hill running test years ago. It also gets confirmed by the rare occasions where I run a 5K race.
This is why I don't see a point in showing anyone else my HR data--because your HR is individual to you and your fitness (well watts are, too, but they are an absolute measure for biking whereas HR and speed are not), and too many people use that to "evaluate" someone's goodness or whatever. An HRM is a great tool to use in one's first few years of endurance training in order to get a feel for HR vs. RPE, and then once you dial in RPE and/or pace, the HR just becomes "interesting." I laugh when people quote "I averaged such and so HR," because everyone's max HR is THEIRS, and how many beats is just a number. The same is sort of true for watts, but the real number there is FT watts/kg, and it's still relative to YOU. So just because some guy who weights 200 lbs. can push 300 watts for 30' doesn't impress me. The more you weigh, the more work you have to do to go a particular speed. If I ride side by side next to that huge guy, I might only be putting out 150 watts! The same is true of HR. If that guy is 28, his HR may be 150, and mine might be 115.
Maybe I should stop posting my wattages, too :)
more terrific info.
Very good points re: HR and wattage info and how they are specific to each individual, particularly HR.
PS, I'm glad I'm making you laugh when I post my avg HR's. ;-)
love it. LOVE IT. You speaky my lingo darlin. Well said and hope just one person will listen to it.
Excellent post. Very concise and well worded.
Post a Comment